The former head of the CIA’s legal division responsible for targeted killings gives a little insight into the practice of death sentences executed by drones
For years, U.S. Forces drove a drone war in the afghan-pakistan border war, tolerated by the pakistani government, to use targeted strikes to kill taliban or al-qaida fighters with hellfire missiles. The purpose of the drone war, which is legally controversial but is also covered by the other states participating in ISAF, such as germany, is to deny insurgents space to retreat and thus weaken them in afghanistan. The attacks are legally controversial because it is not clear whether they are legal military actions under international law in a war sanctioned by the united nations or extralegal executions that take place in a country with which the U.S. Is not at war (targeted killings with combat drones increasingly violate international law).
Under bush, the drone war began in 2004 with isolated attacks; it intensified with obama’s inauguration and troop surge. According to the new american foundation, which attempts to list drone strikes, since 2004 up to the end of january, as many as 2.189 people have been killed, of which between 1.097 and 1.754 to be militants and 32 suspected fighters.