Bad timing?

Bad timing?

A "black book of green-red energy policy" of the CDU/CSU, which apparently will no longer exist after hurricane katrina

Point to the 31.8.In 2005, the C parties published a paper on the technology "black book of grun-red energy policy" – one of the four main authors is mrs. Hasselfeldt, with whom telepolis had spoken shortly before the publication of the black book . By the time the interview was published, the black book had apparently already been withdrawn. The press release can still be found on the website of co-author dagmar wohrl as well as hidden on the website of the CDU parliamentary group (screenshot and text . For this you can download the PDF document from hans-josef fell of the grunen – presumably so you can read his evaluation.

If one takes a look at the apparently hastily compiled text, it quickly becomes clear why the black book is problematic for the party. The PDF contradicts the proclaimed line of the C-parties, for example on the question whether renewable energies should still be demanded as before.

Still at the end of august mrs. Hasselfeldt said in the interview with telepolis that the C parties would leave everything as it was until the end of 2007 and would only then consider a revision, if results of the previous policy were available. Now it reads clearly on the last side of the black book, quasi as catching together: "claim: the renewable energy industry will not be subsidized."

Rather "unchristian capital investment

Why this industry, of all things, is the only one in the federal republic that is not to be subsidized, the black book does not say. I was happy to put this and other questions to ms. Hasselfeldt – for example on the above sheet: why is one investment in renewable energies more unchristian than another?? Isn’t it always the high earners who have so much money to invest? Are all investments unchristian? Is the CDU anti-capitalist?

Unfortunately, their office did not respond to an inquiry by e-mail, nor to several telephone calls – the interlocutor was not available, it said. Only at the office of dr. Klaus W. Lippold, however, a doctor wanted to comment on the black book. He explained that the black book is not a "group paper" is – is supposed to mean that the group is not behind it, but only the four authors are responsible for it. That is why the paper is not online at the CDU/CSU. He could comment on the content only on monday, because he had no time before the elections.

Bad timing?

Bad timing? The C parties criticize the abuse of natural disasters on the part of the red-green coalition, withdraw the PDF again after hurricane katrina devastates the coast of the USA (weltuntergang ).

Maybe the 72 pages of schwarzbuch have contributed to the 2 pages in the PDF document 7 years rot-grun: 7 lost years for germany, because there it is also, rot-grun had still not found a final repository and made the energy only more expensive. After all, making energy more expensive was an election promise made by red-grun. Nota bene: the VAT increase proposed by the CDU-CSU will make not only energy prices but almost everything expensive, including the work of craftsmen, etc..

The black book cites figures from 2002 to show that germany under red-green was even less sustainable than the U.S. (remember: climate killer no. 1) be. In 2005, the U.S. Was still ranked 45th, but germany was 31st. If red-green is to blame for this fast leap forward? Or even the opposition? The black book does not tell.

Who do you vote for when you put your cross behind the C parties on sunday?? The party of paziorek, who wants to hold on to the EEG? Or the party of hasselfeldt, who apparently concealed her will to abolish the EEG in an interview three weeks ago – when the black book was still being worked on?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *